Why India Can’t Stop Talking About Sam Altman’s AI Cricket Sensation?

Here is what’s new in the AI world.

Sam Altman's AI-Generated Cricket Avatar Sparks Buzz In India

India’s cricket obsession has caught the attention of ChatGPT’s creator, Sam Altman, who recently shared an AI-generated anime-style image of himself as a cricketer donning India’s iconic blue jersey.

The playful post on X (formerly Twitter) sent Indian social media into a frenzy, with users split between amusement and skepticism about his intentions.

While Altman has previously joined viral trends like sharing Studio Ghibli-inspired AI art, his choice of an Indian cricket jersey stood out. Many users speculated whether the move was a strategic bid to court India’s massive market.

“Trying hard to attract Indian customers?” quipped one commenter, while others questioned if OpenAI’s recent 40 billion USD funding would translate to investments in India.

The skepticism stems partly from Altman’s past remarks. During a 2023 visit, he dismissed the feasibility of Indian startups competing with OpenAI, calling it “totally hopeless” for small teams with limited budgets to build foundational AI models.

However, his tone shifted during a 2024 meeting with India’s IT minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw, where he praised the country’s rapid AI adoption and revealed India is OpenAI’s second-largest market, with users tripling in a year.

Altman’s recent social media activity praising India’s AI progress, retweeting AI-generated art of PM Narendra Modi in Studio Ghibli style, and now the cricket avatar has fueled theories of a calculated charm offensive.

This comes amid OpenAI’s legal disputes with Indian media giants over alleged unauthorized content use.

Experts argue India’s booming AI market is the real driver. Projected to hit $8 billion USD by 2025, the sector’s 40% CAGR makes it a lucrative battleground for global AI firms.

Nikhil Pahwa of MediaNama notes Altman isn’t alone in wooing India: Perplexity AI’s founder recently pledged 1 million USD to support local startups, while rivals like Gemini and Grok vie for users.

With cheaper alternatives like DeepSeek gaining traction, Pahwa adds, Altman’s overtures are less about “love” and more about retaining market share and developer loyalty.

As Altman balances praise and pragmatism, his anime cricketer serves as a quirky reminder: in the high-stakes AI race, even tech titans must play to the crowd.

From Co-Founders to Court Enemies, Musk vs. Altman Trial Threatens AI’s Future

A federal judge has ruled that billionaire Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI will proceed to a jury trial in spring 2026. The decision by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the U.S.

District Court for the Northern District of California denied Musk’s bid to halt OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit structure, opting instead for an expedited trial.

Musk, who co-founded OpenAI with CEO Sam Altman in 2015, exited the company before its meteoric rise and later launched rival AI venture xAI in 2023.

The legal clash intensified after xAI acquired Musk’s social media platform X (formerly Twitter) in a 33 billion USD deal, enabling shared valuation benefits with X’s investors.

The lawsuit, filed in 2023, accuses OpenAI of abandoning its original nonprofit mission to develop AI “for the benefit of humanity” in favor of profit-driven motives. OpenAI and Altman have refuted these claims, countering that Musk aims to stifle competition.

Altman alleges Musk attempted to derail OpenAI by leading a 97.4 billion USD takeover bid earlier this year, which Altman rejected outright.

Central to the dispute is OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit model, which the company argues is essential to secure funding and remain competitive in the costly AI race.

OpenAI is currently raising up to 40 billion USD in funding rounds, contingent on finalizing its for-profit restructuring by year-end.

Musk’s criticisms contrast sharply with OpenAI’s rapid growth, which has seen India emerge as its second-largest market.

The trial will test claims of breached contractual obligations and OpenAI’s defense that its partnership with Microsoft aligns with its mission. As the AI sector’s financial stakes soar, the outcome could reshape the balance of power among tech titans vying for dominance.

Microsoft Just Resurrected a '90s Classic With Generative AI, Quake II Reborn!

Microsoft has introduced a free, browser-based version of the 1990s shooter Quake II, powered by generative AI.

Unlike traditional games with fixed levels and enemies, this iteration uses Microsoft’s Muse AI model to dynamically generate content inspired by the original game’s style.

Developed with UK studio Ninja Theory, Muse was trained on over 1 billion images and player inputs from the 2020 Xbox title Bleeding Edge, enabling it to mimic gameplay mechanics and visuals over time.

While the project highlights AI’s potential to preserve classic games, Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer has emphasized its ability to “learn” games without needing original hardware or code, the demo has limitations.

Players report low resolution, laggy controls, and restricted session lengths.

The move comes amid broader industry debates about AI’s role in game development. Critics, including artists and writers, warn of threats to creative jobs, while the gaming sector faces layoffs (including at Microsoft).

Still, tech giants are pushing forward: Google recently showcased an AI-generated Doom simulation, and startup Virtual Protocols recreated Super Mario Bros. using text-to-video AI in 2024.

Microsoft’s Muse aims to assist developers, but its long-term reception remains uncertain as the industry balances innovation with ethical and economic concerns.

How Waymo Might Cash In On Your Car Ride Data?

Waymo is considering leveraging data from its autonomous vehicles, including in-car camera footage linked to rider identities, to train generative AI models, according to a draft privacy policy uncovered by researcher Jane Manchun Wong.

The policy also suggests that this data could be used to personalize ads, raising privacy questions about how passenger behavior (e.g, facial expressions, body language) might fuel AI development or marketing efforts.

While riders can opt out of sharing personal information under California privacy laws and block AI training uses, specifics remain murky.

It’s unclear what exact data is collected, how it’s applied, or whether it’s shared with Alphabet subsidiaries like Google or DeepMind.

Growth vs. Profitability

Waymo, the only U.S. robotaxi service generating revenue, now handles over 200,000 paid weekly rides across Los Angeles, San Francisco, Phoenix, and Austin, with plans to expand to Atlanta, Miami, and Washington, D.C.

Despite scaling from 10,000 rides weekly in 2022, profitability remains elusive.

Monetization Pressures

The push to monetize data and explore in-car ads likely stems from ongoing losses, as Waymo invests heavily in R&D, fleet expansion, and infrastructure.

Why Llama 4 Might Be the Tipping Point for Free, Powerful AI?

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg unveiled the Llama 4 AI model series via Instagram, offering two downloadable models, Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout, on platforms like Hugging Face and llama.com.

A third, larger model, Llama 4 Behemoth, remains in preview as training continues. All three support multimodal inputs (text, images, video) and feature extended context windows for processing lengthy documents in a single interaction.

Efficiency & Cost

The models use a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 specialized submodels, activating only relevant components per task to boost efficiency. Meta claims Llama 4 Maverick operates at 0.19–0.19–0.49 per million tokens, undercutting rivals.

Training Innovation

Meta introduced MetaP, a hyperparameter optimization method that scales configurations from smaller models to larger ones like Behemoth, streamlining development.

The largest model leverages significant computational resources during training.

Performance & Safety

Benchmarks show Llama 4 Behemoth competes closely with top models like DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI’s o1, though it lags slightly in specific tasks. Maverick and Scout excel in multimodal reasoning and long-context analysis.

Enhanced safety tools include Llama Guard (detecting unsafe outputs) and Prompt Guard (blocking adversarial inputs), alongside efforts to reduce political bias.

Open-Source Push

By making Llama 4 freely accessible, Meta aims to drive innovation in AI research and commercial applications. The launch underscores the growing rivalry in open-source AI as companies seek to balance performance, cost, and ethical safeguards.

The Open-Source Juggernaut: Why 92% of Coders Now Prefer Free AI Tools?

A recent Stack Overflow study shows that developers strongly favor open-source AI tools and models. The open-source philosophy, built on transparency and community collaboration, has long been central to internet innovation, including platforms like Stack Overflow. Now, it's shaping how developers interact with AI technologies.

Even influential figures like OpenAI’s Sam Altman have acknowledged the limitations of closed-source systems, while Elon Musk’s xAI has pledged to open-source older versions of Grok after each update.

Erin Yepis, a Senior Analyst at Stack Overflow, noted that open-source AI is becoming especially important for early-career developers. These developers often trust open-source tools more for personal projects and learning purposes, seeing them as reliable and accessible.

Generational Insights:

The survey revealed that a large majority (82%) of developers already have some experience with open-source technologies. This aligns with Stack Overflow's activity trends, where nearly half of the most popular tags over the past year involved open-source tools.

Younger developers, while less experienced overall, are enthusiastic adopters of open-source AI for experimentation and education. Many in this group aren’t even sure if they've used open-source tools, highlighting how seamlessly these technologies are integrated into learning environments.

When it comes to preferred contributions, developers enjoy participating in open-source projects (57%), engaging with online communities (50%), and using AI chatbots (49%). In contrast, there's a noticeable reluctance towards working with closed-source AI, many dislike contributing to it (37%), interacting with proprietary AI companies (30%), or using such tools for work or study (27%).

Developers aged 20–34 reported slightly more enthusiasm for AI chatbots, while those aged 35–54 expressed more dissatisfaction with using proprietary software in professional settings. This may reflect shifting attitudes in workplace tech and how developers prefer to interact with AI.

Trust and Transparency:

When asked to compare open-source and proprietary AI, developers showed a clear preference for open-source across all tasks. Trust was highest for open-source AI in learning and personal/school projects (66%) and development work (61%). Proprietary AI lagged behind, especially for creative or strategic tasks, where trust dropped to just 43%.

Interestingly, while both newer and veteran developers trust open-source AI at similar levels, the trust gap for proprietary AI is more pronounced. For instance, only 31% of those with 15–20 years of experience trust proprietary AI for development work, compared to 53% among those with less than five years of experience.

This trust is closely tied to transparency, developers want to understand how models are trained and what data is used. Stack Overflow highlights that trust in data underpins its own platform, where human-verified content is key.

GitHub data reinforces this point: the majority of publicly shared data comes from individuals, which highlights the need for better tools to surface and utilize this information, especially for researchers and non-commercial projects.

Awareness of AI Models:

The survey also measured which large language models (LLMs) developers were most familiar with. Both open-source and proprietary models were recognized, with the top five being:

Open Source: Ethical and Economic Potential:

Stack Overflow emphasizes that open-source AI isn’t just for hobbyists—it represents real business opportunities. Citing insights from Open UK CEO Amanda Brock, the report mentions viable revenue models including paid support, dual-licensing, managed services, and community sponsorship.

Security concerns persist, 44% of developers view open-source AI as a risk, but 48% disagree, suggesting many see community oversight as a strength rather than a weakness.

Most significantly, 86% of respondents believe open-source AI serves the public good. Stack Overflow concludes that open-source is becoming a unifying factor, bridging seasoned developers and newcomers alike. Its future depends on strong communities and solving challenges like discoverability and data access.

In the end, growing trust and adoption of open-source AI will rely on the continued vitality and openness of its developer ecosystems.

Your opinion matters!

Hope you loved reading our piece of newsletter as much as we had fun writing it. 

Share your experience and feedback with us below, ‘cause we take your critique very seriously. 

Thank you for reading

-Shen & Towards AGI team